Thursday, April 24, 2014

NIH/NIAID Partnerships for Diagnostics to Address Antimicrobial Resistance of Select Bacterial Pathogens (R01)



Funding Opportunity Purpose
The purpose of this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to solicit research applications for projects focused on development and/or production of diagnostics that will enable rapid, sensitive, specific, culture-independent detection of high-priority antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. This FOA is focused on select healthcare-associated bacteria where resistance compromises effective treatment, including: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species and extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Applications must include a Product Development Strategy and demonstrate substantive participation by at least one industrial participant.
Key Dates

Open Date (Earliest Submission Date)
May 19, 2014
Letter of Intent Due Date(s)
May 19, 2014
Application Due Date(s)
June 19, 2014, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.
Applicants are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Scientific Merit Review
October 2014
Advisory Council Review
January 2015
Earliest Start Date
April 2015
Expiration Date
June 20, 2014
Award Information
Funding Instrument
Grant: A support mechanism providing money, property, or both to an eligible entity to carry out an approved project or activity.
Application Types Allowed
New
The OER Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide provide details on these application types.
Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards
NIAID intends to commit $12 million in FY 2015 to fund 10 - 15 awards.
Award Budget
Budgets for direct costs of up to $750,000 per year may be requested. In addition, applicants may request up to a total of $300,000 for major equipment in the first year of the award to ensure that research aims can be met and biohazards can be contained. Consortium F&A is not included in the direct cost limitation.  
Award Project Period
The scope of the proposed project should determine the project period. The maximum period is 5 years.


Required Application Instructions
It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in the SF424 (R&R) Application Guide, except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts). Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV. When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions. Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

A compatible version of Adobe Reader is required for download. For Assistance downloading this or any Grants.gov application package, please contact Grants.gov Customer Support at http://www07.grants.gov/contactus/contactus.jsp.
Table of Contents

Full Text of Announcement

Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose
The purpose of this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to solicit research applications for projects focused on development and/or production of medical diagnostics that permit rapid species identification, and optimally, corresponding antibacterial susceptibility profiles for one or more of the following causes of antibacterial-resistant infections in hospital settings: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species, and extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. The primary goal of such diagnostics is to facilitate antibacterial stewardship, thereby reducing selective pressure and improving patient outcomes. A secondary goal, centered on increasing treatment options, is to facilitate enrollment in clinical trials for new antibacterial therapeutics against these pathogens. The proposed diagnostic must be designed to detect the target pathogen(s) in normally sterile sample types, such as blood, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), and pleural fluid, but may also include the detection of the target pathogen(s) in the context of non-sterile sample types, such as those analyzed for hospital- and/or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). The proposed diagnostic platforms and/or technologies must be supported by proof-of-concept data demonstrating feasibility. Examples of research areas supported include, but are not limited to: assay/prototype development; sample preparation; development of broad-spectrum platforms and/or production technologies; adaptation of products or platform technologies to new applications; optimization of products or technologies; process development; manufacturing; and diagnostic validation. 

Industrial Participation
All applications submitted to this FOA by academic organizations must demonstrate substantive investment and participation in the project by at least one industry participant. For the purpose of this FOA, "industry" is defined as large or small, domestic or foreign, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, bioengineering, and/or chemical companies, or non-profit agencies with demonstrated experience in product development. “Substantive investment" is defined as a commitment of one or more resources including, but not limited to: product/prototype development support/guidance, personnel, in kind contributions of materials and/or reagents [i.e., chemical libraries, innovative biotechnology platforms, scale up of Good Manufacturing Process (cGMP) chemical synthesis or production, etc.], provision of animal or other laboratory models for evaluation, subcontracts, data management resources or regulatory support. Support for industrial partner activities may be included in the project budget. The Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) (PD(s)/PI(s)) of the project may be affiliated with either an academic organization or industry. Applications submitted by industrial institutions or product development non-profit agencies do not require an additional partner.

Background
Escalating resistance to antibacterial agents is an increasing contributor to morbidity, mortality, and rising healthcare costs. Emerging pan-drug resistance has been documented for a subset of hospital-associated infections, such as those caused by the Gram-negative pathogensKlebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species and extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. The emergence of these untreatable infections highlights the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and the need to develop new therapeutics against the causative pathogens. Development of rapid and informative diagnostics will help address this growing public health challenge by allowing clinicians to quickly determine the most effective treatment for infected individuals and will facilitate antimicrobial stewardship by reducing the empiric use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Additionally, such diagnostics would benefit development and approval of new antibacterials by reducing the diagnostic uncertainty that necessitates enrollment of large numbers of patients who may not be evaluable in pivotal efficacy trials. Hence, rapid diagnostics should provide a means to reduce the size and cost of antibacterial clinical trials. Accordingly, development of new diagnostics that will enable enrichment of evaluable subjects in therapeutic clinical trials are of particular interest. An FDA Draft Guidance released in July 2013 provides information related to the development of diagnostics for this use (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM359184.pdf). It is expected that proposed diagnostics will be developed with the ultimate goal of obtaining FDA clearance; however such clearance need not be the final result of the proposed research project.

Research Objectives
The objective of this FOA is to solicit research that will advance the development and/or production of diagnostics that will enable rapid, sensitive, specific, culture-independent species identification of key Gram-negative hospital-associated pathogens (listed below). Priority will be given to diagnostics that additionally provide corresponding antibacterial susceptibility profiles for the targeted pathogen(s). Each application must propose a research and development project whose goal is to advance a diagnostic platform/technology. Research projects are not required to result in a "final" product. Moreover, it is not necessary to propose to complete the product development process up to the point of readiness for validation within the time frame of the project. Applications for projects that would significantly advance a candidate diagnostic product/platform toward clinical utility are responsive and encouraged.
Applications must include plans to detect one or more of the following Gram-negative bacteria pathogens:
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae,
  • Acinetobacter baumannii
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Enterobacter species
  • Extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli
Diagnostic platforms/technologies intended for differential diagnosis and/or clinical decision making must incorporate multiple bacterial targets, including at least one of the Gram-negative species listed above and may include diagnosis of additional pathogens. Detection of host factors predictive of bacterial infection that may provide clinically actionable information may also be included. A proposed diagnostic intended solely to facilitate clinical trial enrollment for a pathogen-specific drug may target a single Gram-negative species from the above list and optimally would report antibacterial susceptibility profiles.
The proposed diagnostic technologies must detect the target pathogen(s) from at least one normally sterile specimen type, such as blood, CSF, or pleural fluid. Focusing on these sample types will allow validation of the technology in a setting where colonizing organisms are not a complicating factor. There are a number of other types of hospital-associated infections where rapid diagnostics are also needed, but where the presence of commensal/colonizing organisms makes interpretation of test results difficult. Therefore, applications may also include plans to include detection of the target pathogen(s) in non-sterile sample types such as those analyzed for HAP/VAP; for such plans, applicants must specify how contamination with colonizing organisms will be addressed.
For the purposes of this FOA, the following test characteristics are of greatest importance:
  • Rapid: Proposed diagnostic test time of < 3 hours for clinical diagnostics that identify species and resistance profile information or < 1 hour for clinical trial enrichment tools, which includes the time required to process the clinical sample (if appropriate) through detection and final test result;
  • Culture-independent: the diagnostic should focus on direct detection of the target pathogen(s) from normally sterile samples;
  • Sensitive: sensitivity should be equivalent to or exceed sensitivity of FDA-cleared tests for proposed agent(s) from the same sample type; and
  • Specific: specificity should be equivalent to or exceed specificity of FDA-cleared tests for proposed agent(s) from the same sample type.
In addition, the following characteristics are desirable, but not essential to prototype diagnostics developed under this FOA:
  • Easy to use: i.e.,  integrated, closed sample-to-answer system with automated data analyses and/or result presentation and with minimal operator training and expertise required;
  • Random Access: the instrument should allow samples to be run as needed;
  • Adaptable: capable of integrating new diagnostic tests for agents as required, including detection of modified or new targets;
  • Non-nucleic acid amplification-based: due to failures of previous Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) in detecting bacteria from normally sterile sites, non-NAAT approaches are of higher priority unless a strong rationale is presented that documents why the proposed technology will overcome the challenges of predecessor NAATs; and
  • Cost-effective: projected production and operating costs should be consistent with commonly used platforms for detecting hospital-associated infections.
 Examples of potential activities to be supported include, but are not limited to:
  • Use of nanotechnology, microfluidic-based systems or any other novel or innovative system to process large numbers of patient samples;
  • Integrated sample-to-answer technologies for rapid, multiplexed antigen or other analyte detection using novel and improved sample processing and detection methods and reagents;
  • Integrated sample-to-answer technologies capable of high throughput multiplex screening using  analytes or signature biomarkers to identify human immune or other physiological response to infection;
  • Technologies capable of detecting drug-resistance/drug-susceptibility, relevant to clinical decision making;
  • Technologies and capacity for high throughput, automated data management, output and analyses; and
  • In vivo imaging methods and development of contrast reagents for visualization of pathogens or host immune responses in vivo.
NOTE: PD(s)/PI(s) are strongly encouraged to obtain expertise in regulatory matters and reimbursement topics associated with product development. Expertise may be retained as defined effort or may be included as periodic consultation on specific issues.
NOTE: The following application types will be considered non-responsive and will not be reviewed:
  • Applications proposing development of a diagnostic that lacks the required capability to detect at least one of the following pathogens: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species, and extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli.
  • Applications proposing the development of a diagnostic that lacks the required capability to detect the specified pathogen from a normally sterile site, such as blood, CSF, or pleural fluid.
  • Applications lacking proof-of-concept data for proposed diagnostic platforms/technologies.
  • Applications that do not have the ultimate goal of detection and identification of pathogens in human clinical samples, or those which are focused on development of environmental or workplace pathogen/toxin detection technologies.
  • Applications that propose clinical trial(s). While clinical development strategies may be included within an overall project, this FOA will NOT support clinical trials. Utilization of human-derived material in pre-clinical studies in support of compliance with regulatory requirements is permitted and encouraged.

Friday, April 18, 2014

Big News on NIH Application Submission Policy


Big News on NIH Application Submission Policy

For the past few years, you could resubmit just one time if your initial application didn't succeed.

Now you can send a new (A0) application without NIH requiring you to make substantial changes to the scientific direction or scope. This means after an unsuccessful application, you can send a new application in the same scientific vein.

A new (A0) application always gets a new serial number, and there is no formal link between it and any prior application.

You can follow a resubmission (A1) application only with an A0 application.
If you are submitting a new application after an unsuccessful competing renewal (Type 2) application, the next application must be new (Type 1 A0).
Apply on the new application due date, not the renewal date.
For the official announcement, including reasons for the change, see the April 17, 2014, Guide notice. Also see the updated FAQ on Resubmissions of NIH Applications.

The New Policy Is Already In Effect
You can take advantage of this for your next due date since the policy kicked in for due dates after April 16. The first standard due date affected is May 7, 2014, for AIDS and AIDS-related applications.

You must wait for your summary statement from the previous application's review before sending a new application or else NIH might consider it an overlapping application with the previous one. An application is considered under review until the summary statement is released (that rule is still in effect). Also, you can't send an overlapping application while a prior similar one is under appeal. Learn more at Evaluation of Overlapping Applications.

Now that you aren’t obligated to make substantial changes in scientific direction or scope after an unsuccessful application, you'll have to decide whether that's the right move. See our advice below and discuss with your program officer.

Our Advice
We're still working on site updates to reflect this breaking news. Meanwhile, our advice probably sounds familiar: always strive to enhance your next application.

For all applications:

Strengthen your next submission of the application using reviewers’ feedback in the summary statement, from your program officer, and from your mentoring colleagues
Add the latest preliminary data and new publications.
Ensure your application reflects the most current science.
Consider which study section and institute or center assignments you want for this application and make that request in your cover letter.
Use the latest funding opportunity announcement (FOA) and forms associated with your planned receipt date.
For an A0 application in the same vein as a prior application, also do the following:

Take a hard look at whether another attempt using the same idea is likely to result in funding.
Even if you submit your previously reviewed application as new (an A0), it may go to the same study section and reviewers are likely to remember it from before. You won't have the benefit of an introduction to address the prior comments. Therefore, make sure you have taken reviewers' suggestions into consideration when writing your application.
We don't anticipate substantial improvement in paylines, so don't count on that.
Consider adjusting or completely overhauling your proposal as needed.
Follow the FOA's procedures for new applications.
Don't respond directly to comments from prior reviews. Just use them to improve the application.
Omit the introduction.
For type 2, also omit the progress report.
Get prior approvals again as required. For examples, see the Big Grants SOP and Conference Awards SOP.
Confirm you still meet any eligibility criteria (career stage or other qualifiers.)
One last note: if you plan to send multiple applications on non-overlapping topics, consider staggering your timing so they don't both end up in the same study section for the same round of initial peer review. Otherwise, you're competing with yourself.

As we update our site, we'll list the changes on Latest Funding Updates. We'll also share any new advice for you in follow-up articles.

If you have any questions or feedback about how this new policy affects you, email us at deaweb@niaid.nih.gov .

Thursday, April 17, 2014

MESA (Malaria Eradication Scientific Alliance) Operational Research Grants


MESA (Malaria Eradication Scientific Alliance) is delighted to get in touch with an exciting update on activities from 2014.  We remind you that you can follow MESA on Twitter (@MESAmalaria) and watch MESA's blog space on MalariaWorld for up-to-date information.

Keystone Symposia Meeting "The Science of Malaria Eradication" 
'The Science of Malaria Eradication', a conference co-organized by MESA and Keystone Symposia, brought together 170 scientists from 37 different countries during 2 - 7 February 2014 in Merida, Mexico.  There was participation in exciting presentations and engaging discussions that showcased the cutting edge of malaria eradication science.  

Daily blogs from the meeting can be read here, and you can see the abstract book online here.  A group photo from the Mayan ruins of Mayapan is attached in this email.

Operational Research Grants 
Four new operational research projects in malaria elimination are under-way after being selected for funding through MESA. The MESA operational research portfolio includes: novel diagnostic and vector control tools, mapping technologies for surveillance, and mobile phone applications for hard to reach populations. Each project has a strong partnership between the country stakeholders and researchers, and the operational research questions addressed will generate information directly relevant to the country programmes.  

You can read the project summaries here, and find a schematic of the review process here.

MESA Alliance YouTube Channel 
MESA is proud to bring to your attention a new way to view great lectures on malaria elimination and eradication science, and learn from malaria programmes from all over the malaria community.  The new MESA Alliance YouTube channel highlights videos provided by you, for you!  

Browse the various playlists from 'basic science' to 'eradication strategies', and subscribe to the channel to receive notifications when new content is posted.  Please do not hesitate to send video suggestions toMESA@isglobal.org.

Friday, April 4, 2014

Global Partners Pledge $240 Million to Fight Neglected Tropical Diseases


Global Partners Pledge $240 Million to Fight Neglected Tropical Diseases

APRIL 3, 2014
 1 1Google +0 1Print
Global Partners Pledge $240 Million to Fight Neglected Tropical Diseases
Uniting to Combat NTDs, a partnership of foundations, global health organizations, and pharmaceutical companies, has announced commitments totaling $240 million to fight neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) that disproportionately affect the world's most vulnerable populations.
A new commitment of $120 million by a group of the partners of will be used to combat soil-transmitted helminths (STH), intestinal worms that are among the most common cause of infections in poor children. The funding includes commitments of $50 million from theChildren's Investment Fund Foundation to provide technical assistance to national deworming programs; $50 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to explore the feasibility of interrupting transmission and mitigating the risks of drug resistance; $8 million over five years from the Buenos Aires-based nonprofit Mundo Sano to test strategies for deworming and develop combination treatments; and $4.5 million from Vitamin Angels to scale deworming with Vitamin A distributions and  implementation support.
In addition, Dubai Cares will design programs that integrate nutrition, deworming, and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in schools; WaterAid will deliver WASH programs in NTD-endemic areas; and the World Food Programme will work to ensure deworming interventions are provided as part of school feeding programs.
The World Bank also announced that it is committing $120 million from the International Development Association, its fund for the poorest countries, to support NTD control and elimination programs across Africa, including support for school-based deworming programs.
Spearheaded by the Gates Foundation and launched two years ago to support efforts to meet theWorld Health Organization's control, elimination, and eradication targets for ten specific NTDs by 2020, the Uniting to Combat NTDs effort also includes the U.S. Agency for International Development, the UK Department for International Development, more than a dozen pharmaceutical companies, and a number of nongovernmental organizations. In conjunction with the announcement of the new commitments, the partnership released a report highlighting the progress made over the past two years.
"We're taking the 'neglect' out of neglected tropical diseases, thanks to the commitment of partners from across the public and private sectors," said Gates Foundation co-chair Bill Gates. "Pharmaceutical companies are providing drugs free of charge, endemic countries are scaling up integrated screen-and-treat programs for multiple diseases, and donors are delivering essential funding. If we stay focused, we can reach the London Declaration's 2020 goals and help provide millions with access to health."
"Global Partners Are Taking the 'Neglect' Out of 'Neglected Tropical Diseases'." Uniting to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases Press Release 04/02/2014.